Ontario government fights sex-ed curriculum challenge in court


The Elementary Teachers Union and other groups gathered inside a Toronto courtroom Wednesday to bring back the updated sex-ed curriculum.

Standing outside Ontario Superior Court, the president of the Elementary Teachers Federation says removing a modern sex-ed curriculum for one that was created in 1998 is unconstitutional.

Sam Hammond added that the new “snitch line” resulted in a tense environment for teachers.

“When the government implemented that snitch line as we have been saying for quite some time, it put chill on teachers across this province.”

Unlike the 1990’s guideline, the 2015 version included topics such as cyber safety, sexting and LGBTQ+ communities.

Paul Calandra, appointed to speak for the PC’s says his daughter’s teachers have managed to find a balance.

“Teachers at my children’s school, the York Board have been spectacular in how they’ve dealt with this. If the kids have questions teachers are able to ask those questions in a safe and effective learning environment.”

But Cindy Gangaram, who teaches at Ryerson Middle School in Hamilton paints a different experience.

“Teachers are covertly threatened to actually deliver this curriculum and if we choose to teach ideas such as explicit lessons on gender identity that used to be in the 2015 grade 8 curriculum we may face repercussions.”

The EFTO isn’t alone in court.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association argue that brining back the old curriculum alienates certain groups like LGBTQ+.

A student CHCH spoke with this morning agrees.

“What does that mean for me? Does that mean my side of the story doesn’t matter because I’m gay I’m not normal?”

As EFTO’s lawyers state their case at Osgoode Hall in downtown Toronto, up the street at Queen’s Park, the PC’s are defending their actions of bringing back the 1998 curriculum while they consult for the new sex-ed program that’s expected to be finished by next school year.

“Once we’ve digested the over 70,000 contributions that we’ve had we’ll be able to come forward in some time in the next couple of months and be prepared for the fall of 2019.”

In a document released before the hearing, the province argues that if the 1998 sex-ed curriculum wasn’t unconstitutional then it shouldn’t be now.

The province is expected to speak sometime Thursday in hopes of dismissing the entire hearing.


Commenting Guidelines

  • Comments are open for 2 days only after publication of article
  • All comments subject to approval
    • Comments must be constructive and a minimum of 5 words
    • Please do not submit multiple identical comments
    • Personal attacks will not be posted
    • We reserve the right to edit submissions for spelling, grammar, and language
  • CH-CHing! points will be awarded upon submission, however comments will not appear live until they have been approved
  • During the approval process, we reserve the right to withdraw CH-CHing! points awarded to you for comments that do not meet the above guidelines